The V-cone flowmeter produced by Far Energy Instruments saves energy and reduces emissions

The V-cone flowmeter produced by Far-energy meters saves energy and reduces emissions:

For flow meters, the level of energy consumption depends on the permanent pressure loss of the flowmeter, large energy consumption with large pressure loss, and low energy consumption with low pressure loss. Since there are many orifice meter instruments used in the metallurgical industry, the pressure loss between the orifice plate and the V-cone is compared below to see how much energy is consumed in the process of measuring the flow.
　　
Example 1: Saturated steam flow measurement of a plant, pipe diameter 257; work pressure 0.9MPa; operating temperature 175.35 °C; density 4.655kg/m3; maximum flow 30t/h; common flow 20t/h. The orifice plate and V-cone flow meter take the same β = 0.6. The calculation results are as follows (For the calculation formula and calculation process, see the CD-ROM data): When the flow rate is 20t/h, the pressure loss of the orifice is: 14.162kPaV The pressure loss of the cone is: 6.523kPa The orifice plate has a greater permanent pressure loss than the V-cone. In kPa, the orifice consumes 11.395 kW/h more per hour than the V cone at the same flow rate. According to the current industrial average energy cost of 0.8 yuan/(), calculated by driving 300 days a year, only one set of orifice flowmeter will spend more than the V-cone annual electricity bill: 0.8 (yuan) x 11.395 (kW/h) ×24 (hours) × 300 (days) = 65.63 million yuan
　　
Example 2: blast furnace gas, pipe diameter: 702.4mm, working pressure (G): 12kPa, temperature: 70°C, local atmospheric pressure: 98.39kPa, working density 1.0326kg/m3, common flow 25000m3/h orifice plate and V cone take the same β = 0.6955. The calculation results are as follows: Under normal flow, the pressure loss of the orifice plate is: 1.894kPaV The pressure loss of the cone is: 0.479kPa The orifice plate is 1.415kPa larger than the permanent pressure loss of the V cone, and it consumes more energy per hour under the same flow conditions. 12.283 kW/h. In accordance with the industrial energy fee 0.8 yuan/(), calculated every year by driving 330 days, only a set of holes
　　
The plate flow meter will spend more than the V-cone flow rate each year: 0.8 (yuan) × 12.283 (kW/h) × 24 (hours) × 330 (days) = 77.83 million yuan. It can be seen from the above calculations that it is not caused at ordinary times. We attach importance to a small set of flow meters, and there is so much potential (or such a large amount of waste not found) that can be tapped on the type of instrument used. It can be seen that the V-cone flow meter energy-saving effect is very significant. In the situation that China's electric energy is still insufficiently supplied, the use of energy-saving flow meters not only creates profits for the company itself, but also conforms to the industrial policy of energy conservation and emission reduction advocated by the government.

Counter Flow Closed Cooling Tower

Let's look at the comparison of electric energy, electric energy is not different, because they are all through the same power equipment to operate the equipment, the power of the two is similar, the running time is the same, basically the energy consumption is about the same.

To sum up, for the Closed Cooling Tower energy saving accounting can be strong to open the tower out, and, today are advocating energy conservation and environmental protection, this is the general trend, so the closed cooling tower is more and more favored by the majority of users.

Counter Flow Closed Cooling Tower,Closed Type Cooling Tower,Cooling Tower Closed Loop System,Closed Circuit Cooling Tower

Wuxi Ark Fluid Science Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.fangzhou-arkfluid.com